{"id":9744,"date":"2021-12-20T14:16:54","date_gmt":"2021-12-20T18:16:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/starlightcascade.ca\/blog\/?p=9744"},"modified":"2021-12-20T14:20:21","modified_gmt":"2021-12-20T18:20:21","slug":"jupiter-2021dec12","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starlightcascade.ca\/blog\/2021\/12\/jupiter-2021dec12\/","title":{"rendered":"Jupiter 2021Dec12"},"content":{"rendered":"

Seeing was NOT DISGUSTING this evening… merely poor!
\nThe following three images are the best 5%, 10% and 25% of 1340 frames with autostakkert3! in a 30 second run.
\nThis really highlights the need for more frames, more signal to noise.
\nIn the best 5% may look a little sharper than the 10% and 25% but the noise mottling on the surface is very noticable!<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\"<\/a>
Jupiter best 5% of 1340<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/p>\n
\"\"<\/a>
Jupiter best 10% of 1340<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/p>\n
\"\"<\/a>
Jupiter best 25% of 1340<\/figcaption><\/figure>
\n<\/table>\n

And below is the best 25% of a 180 second run with over 8300 frames. The moons in the upper left are Io and Europa
\n

\"\"<\/a>
Jupiter best 25% of 8300<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/p>\n

FireCapture v2.6 Settings
\n————————————
\nCamera=ZWO ASI290MC
\nFilter=L
\nProfile=Jupiter
\nDiameter=37.04″
\nMagnitude=-2.23
\nCMI=247.3\u00b0 CMII=258.3\u00b0 CMIII=112.3\u00b0 (during mid of capture)
\nFocalLength=2900mm
\nResolution=0.21″
\nFilename=2021-12-12-2237_6-L-Jup_ZWO ASI290MC_Exposure=8.0ms.ser
\nDate=121221
\nStart=223608.954
\nMid=223738.958
\nEnd=223908.962
\nStart(UT)=223608.954
\nMid(UT)=223738.958
\nEnd(UT)=223908.962
\nDuration=180.008s
\nDate_format=ddMMyy
\nTime_format=HHmmss
\nLT=UT
\nFrames captured=8301
\nFile type=SER
\nBinning=no
\nROI=600×646
\nROI(Offset)=896×160
\nFPS (avg.)=46
\nShutter=7.964ms
\nGain=297 (49%)
\nAutoExposure=off
\nSoftwareGain=10 (off)
\nWBlue=90 (off)
\nGamma=50
\nHighSpeed=off
\nFPS=100 (off)
\nBrightness=1 (off)
\nUSBTraffic=68 (off)
\nAutoGain=off
\nWRed=50 (off)
\nAutoHisto=75 (off)
\nHistogramm(min)=0
\nHistogramm(max)=213
\nHistogramm=83%
\nNoise(avg.deviation)=n\/a
\nLimit=180 Seconds
\nSensor temperature=11.5\u00b0C<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Seeing was NOT DISGUSTING this evening… merely poor! The following three images are the best 5%, 10% and 25% of 1340 frames with autostakkert3! in a 30 second run. This really highlights the need for more frames, more signal to noise. In the best 5% may look a little sharper than the 10% and 25% […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9744","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-astronomy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starlightcascade.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9744","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starlightcascade.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starlightcascade.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starlightcascade.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starlightcascade.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9744"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/starlightcascade.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9744\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9754,"href":"https:\/\/starlightcascade.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9744\/revisions\/9754"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starlightcascade.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9744"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starlightcascade.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9744"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starlightcascade.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9744"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}